跳至主要内容
2026全美生殖中心排名第 38 🏆 TOP 50

數據來源:Newsweek 2026 全美最佳生育診所排名

Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine

US 美國
· Chicago
SART·美國輔助生殖技術協會會員
SART會員診所,定期向CDC和SART提交成功率資料
CAP·美國病理學家協會實驗室認證
IVF與男科學實驗室通過CAP認證
口碑
推薦
優質口碑醫院,源自真實好評
2.9
46
條評價
121
人預約
立即預約
Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine
Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine 2
Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine 3

醫院簡介

Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine(西北醫學中心生育與生殖醫學中心) — 芝加哥輔助生殖中心

機構簡介

Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine(西北醫學中心生育與生殖醫學中心) 隸屬於 西北紀念醫院(Northwestern Memorial Hospital) — 被《美國新聞與世界報道》評為全美婦產科領域排名前列的醫院。該中心是芝加哥地區最具學術實力的生殖醫學中心之一,依託 西北大學費恩伯格醫學院(Feinberg School of Medicine) 的雄厚科研實力,為患者提供從基礎生育評估到前沿輔助生殖技術的全方位服務。

中心擁有經美國婦產科委員會(ABOG)雙認證(婦產科 + 生殖內分泌與不孕症專科)的生殖內分泌專家團隊,以及胚胎學家、遺傳諮詢師、心理學家、高階執業醫師組成的多學科團隊。中心的IVF與男科學實驗室獲得 CAP 實驗室認證,並持有 SART 會員資格,定期向CDC提交透明的成功率資料。中心現任醫學主任為 Mary Ellen Pavone 教授

成功率資料

根據 SART 2023 Final 報告,該中心的活產率表現如下:

年齡段中心活產率(按預期取卵)全國平均值
<35歲56.3%53.2%
35-37歲39.9%39.9%
38-40歲21.9%26.2%
>40歲8.0%9.4%

中心2023年共報告 3,355個ART週期(SART 2023 Final),是全美規模最大的學術型生殖中心之一。

榮譽與成就

  • 隸屬全美婦產科排名前列醫院:西北紀念醫院被《美國新聞與世界報道》評為全美婦產科領域排名前列的醫院
  • SART會員資格:持有美國輔助生殖技術協會(SART)會員資格,定期提交透明的成功率資料,SART資料公開可查
  • CAP認證胚胎實驗室:IVF與男科學實驗室獲得美國病理學家協會(CAP)實驗室認證
  • 全ABOG雙認證專家團隊:生殖內分泌與不孕症專家全部持有美國婦產科委員會(ABOG)婦產科及生殖內分泌與不孕症雙專科認證
  • 領先的研究實力:中心的生殖科學家在國際上享有盛譽,開展多項與不孕症和生殖相關的開創性臨床研究,研究專案獲NIH和蓋茨基金會資助

核心優勢

  • 西北紀念醫院學術背書:依託全美婦產科排名前列的西北紀念醫院和西北大學費恩伯格醫學院,患者可享受多學科聯合診療和最新科研成果轉化
  • ABOG雙認證專家團隊:全美規模最大的學術型生殖醫學團隊之一,涵蓋生殖內分泌與不孕症全領域亞專長
  • 頂尖IVF實驗室:配備延時影片胚胎監測系統(Embryoscopes)、LifeAire空氣淨化系統、雷射胚胎操作與活檢技術,以及24/7實驗室安防監控
  • 全面的生育力儲存服務:為癌症患者等有生育保護需求的人群提供胚胎冷凍、卵子冷凍、卵巢組織冷凍、精子庫、TESE等完整方案
  • LGBTQ+友好中心:為同性伴侶和跨性別者提供包容、專業的生育方案,包括第三方輔助生殖服務
  • 心理支援服務:配備專職生殖心理學家,為患者和家庭提供全程心理支援和諮詢服務
  • 遠端醫療服務:支援遠端問診,方便外州及國際患者

輔助生殖服務

中心提供全面的不孕症診療服務:

  • 生育力評估:卵巢功能評估(AMH、竇卵泡計數、FSH)、子宮輸卵管造影(HSG)、宮腔超聲造影(SIS)、精液分析等
  • IUI 人工授精:適用於輕度男性因素、排卵障礙及不明原因不孕
  • IVF 體外受精:傳統IVF和ICSI單精子注射,含新鮮和冷凍胚胎移植
  • PGT 胚胎植入前遺傳學檢測:PGT-A(非整倍體篩查)
  • ICSI 單精子注射:適用於男性因素不孕或既往IVF受精失敗
  • 卵子冷凍與胚胎冷凍:玻璃化冷凍技術儲存卵子、精子和胚胎
  • 生育力儲存:為癌症患者及需要化療/放療的患者提供治療前生育力保護
  • 卵子捐贈專案:使用捐贈卵子的IVF治療
  • 胚胎捐贈:將剩餘胚胎捐贈給其他家庭
  • 供精人工授精(TDI):使用匿名供體精子的治療性供精
  • 控制性卵巢超促排卵(COH):藥物促排配合IUI
  • 第三方輔助生殖:代孕育兒服務
  • LGBTQIA+ 生育方案:為同性伴侶和跨性別者提供個性化生育方案
  • 複發性流產評估與治療:染色體檢查、免疫因素評估及針對性治療
  • 生殖外科手術:宮腔鏡、腹腔鏡及機器人輔助手術,治療子宮肌瘤、息肉、子宮內膜異位症、輸卵管疾病等
  • 遺傳諮詢:遺傳攜帶者篩查、遺傳病風險評估
  • 心理支援:專職生殖心理學家提供一對一諮詢和支援小組

費用參考

Northwestern Medicine Center for Fertility and Reproductive Medicine 提供透明的費用管理體系,配備專職財務顧問團隊協助患者處理保險和費用事宜:

  • 保險覆蓋:伊利諾伊州法律規定健康保險計劃必須為不孕症診斷和治療提供保險覆蓋(215 ILCS 5/356m),是全美少數幾個強制要求IVF保險覆蓋的州之一。中心接受29種保險計劃,包括Aetna、BCBS、Cigna、UnitedHealthcare等主要保險公司
  • 財務顧問:每位患者可享受專屬財務顧問服務,協助保險預先認證(約需7-21天)、賬單查詢及替代財務安排
  • 藥房福利:通過 Northwestern Medicine Specialty Pharmacy 處理促排卵藥物福利和預先認證
  • 無保險患者:中心為無保險或保險不完全覆蓋的患者提供替代財務安排方案
  • 多院區服務:芝加哥、日內瓦、海蘭帕克、奧克布魯克特萊斯四個院區均提供財務諮詢服務

就診流程

  1. 提交初診表格:通過 MyNM Patient Portal(首選)、郵箱或傳真提交 New Patient Health History Form 和 Preoperative History Form,建議提前1周提交
  2. 收到歡迎包:中心會提前郵寄歡迎包,可提前將病歷傳真至中心
  3. 首次就診:病史回顧 + 體格檢查 + 超聲檢查(如需),鼓勵伴侶一同參加
  4. 會見財務顧問:瞭解保險覆蓋範圍及費用安排
  5. 完成生育力評估:激素檢測(卵巢儲備、排卵)、精液分析、子宮輸卵管造影(HSG)等
  6. 制定個性化治療方案:與醫生團隊討論治療目標,選擇最適合的輔助生殖技術(IVF、ICSI、PGT、IUI等)
  7. 週期治療與隨訪:促排卵 → 卵泡監測 → 取卵/取精 → 受精 → 胚胎培養 → PGT檢測(如需)→ 胚胎移植 → 妊娠確認與隨訪

當地法律說明

伊利諾伊州輔助生殖法律框架:伊利諾伊州是全美對輔助生殖技術立法最為完善的州之一。伊利諾伊州法律規定,健康保險計劃必須為不孕症診斷和治療提供保險覆蓋(215 ILCS 5/356m),是全美少數幾個強制要求IVF保險覆蓋的州之一。胚胎冷凍、PGT基因檢測和胚胎捐贈在伊利諾伊州明確合法。代孕受《伊利諾伊州代孕法案》(750 ILCS 47)規範,允許商業代孕和利他代孕,代孕協議在滿足法定要求後具有法律執行力。LGBTQ+家庭在伊利諾伊州享有平等的生育權利。

核心優勢

三代試管(PGT-A)
LGBT友好
生育力儲存
捐卵服務

醫院位置

259 E Erie St Suite 2400, Chicago, IL 60611

配套設施

接受信用卡
無障礙設施
遠端醫療

醫療團隊

用戶評價

2.9
46條評價
5星
65%
4星
20%
3星
8%
2星
4%
1星
3%
C
Cassandra Villadonga
已編輯:2 周前

這家診所的問題從一開始就出現了。我換了好幾個護士,最後才終於被安排到我主治醫生的一位護士那裡。和大多數第一次做試管嬰兒的患者一樣,我們有很多問題。但我處處碰壁。取卵前一天晚上,我接到一個匿名電話,是他們的專案經理奧利維亞·P打來的。我從未見過她,也不明白她為什麼要給我打電話,或者為什麼她的資訊會出現在我的HIPAA(健康保險流通與責任法案)鎖定的病歷裡。她總是用擴音通話,這讓我感覺很不安。我的第一次移植,一個6AA級的胚胎,失敗了。第二次移植時,我又遇到了更多醫學方面的問題。…...

The problems at this clinic started right away. I had a few different nurses but then finally got placed with one for my given doctor. We had many questions like most first time IVF patients would expect to have. I was met with resistance at every turn. The night before my egg retrieval I received a blocked number calling me and it was Olivia P their program manager. I never met her and did not understand why she was calling me or why she was in my locked hippa chart. She would always call me on speaker which felt very unsettling. My first transfer of a 6AA embryo was a failure. During my second transfer I had more medical questions. I received a blocked call from one of the nurses who asked me, "what I wanted?". No one ever wanted to help me. During this second cycle I still had this Olivia P contacting me. The second IVF transfer ended with the death of my baby at 15 weeks. My dead baby's pathology showed the opposite gender of what was implanted and I only had embryos of one gender. So NMH genetics sent samples to whole genome sequencing and sent a sample back to their pgt place, RGI to verify it was ours. I mycharted with Dr. Pavone who told me to make a follow up once I felt well enough. A few days later while I'm bleeding from my D& E procedure Dr. Jungheim, Chief of the Fertility department calls me on speaker phone and told me I cannot get medical care at northwestern. She then sent me a letter with cryptic words that are used to describe an alive baby and she wrote, " our patient relationship is not viable." She also wrote that I didn't trust them. I think any mother whose baby was an opposite gender would be confused. Anyways, seemed like a very harsh use of words to a mother who just spent 4 years trying to conceive and was still bleeding after removal of the dead IVF baby at NMH. I also had a hysteroscopy surgery under Anesthesia and Dr. Pavone chose not to biopsy for endometritis even after my recurrent loss diagnosis. CCRM and NMH OB found recurrent positive biopsies for endometritis. It’s hard to know if this being treated would have led to a live birth but the research is there! It’s so sad how I was treated. We had to spend thousands of dollars to move our embryos out of here. Many months of time have been wasted to re-establish care and so far all of our embryos created here did not make it to a live birth.

Z
Zach
2 個月前

雖然這裡的醫生醫術精湛,但整個系統令人作嘔。預約要等六個月,而且醫療團隊每小時都在更換,還總是出錯。千萬別來這裡。人生最重要的手術,在這裡卻遭遇如此疏忽,讓你感覺孤立無援。整個團隊的無能令人難以置信。你去任何其他地方都比這裡好。他們根本不把病人放在眼裡,忙得讓人感覺他們根本不在乎你的生殖健康。他們甚至因為太忙而開錯檢查單,簡直到了翫忽職守的地步。去任何地方都比這裡好,哪怕是墨西哥也行。

While the individuals here are talented, the system as a whole is disgusting. Wait 6 months for appts and have a care team that changes by the hour and constantly messes up. Please do not go here. For the most important procedure of your…...

J
Jennifer Viteri
3 個月前

我和我丈夫非常感謝賈恩醫生和護士們。我們之前就隱約覺得我的月經週期有點不對勁,而賈恩醫生和護士們讓我們感到安心。他根據我的具體情況建議我服用卡麥角林和黃體酮,事實證明他的建議是正確的。就在那個月經週期,我們就懷孕了。我們真的很幸運,但這都要歸功於賈恩醫生和護士們。現在我們的小傢伙已經三個月大了。

My husband and I are so grateful for Dr. Jain and the nurses. We had a hunch something was off about my cycles and we felt heard. Dr. Jain suggested cabergoline and progesterone for my specific case and he was correct. We got pregnant that same cycle. We are truly lucky but credit Dr. Jain and the nurses. Our little guy is now 3 months.

A
Agnieszka Iwaszczyszyn
4 個月前

我在西北大學的第一個治療週期不僅徹底失敗,而且還不允許我更換醫生。儘管我是自費的,他們卻不斷向我的保險公司重複收費,而我的保險公司並不承保生育治療,所以將近一年過去了,除了自費之外,我還得支付額外的賬單和自付部分。缺乏現代化的治療方案,缺乏同理心,等待時間過長,而且收費不透明。簡直糟糕透了。

Not only did my first cycle with Northwestern end in complete failure, but I was not allowed to switch doctors, and although I was self pay, they keep DOUBLE BILLING my insurance which does not cover fertility and so I have bills and copays…...

J
Jesus Rodriguez
6 個月前

我記錄這段經歷是因為,儘管與這個團隊接觸僅一個月左右,我就對他們的溝通、程式公正性和醫療服務中的偏見產生了嚴重的擔憂。…...

I am documenting this experience because, despite interacting with this team for only about a month, I developed serious concerns about communication, procedural fairness, and bias in care. The issue began when I received inaccurate insurance guidance from a specialty pharmacy representative and was directed to obtain documentation that ultimately proved inconsistent with actual policy requirements. This resulted in unnecessary confusion and significant time spent trying to resolve conflicting information. Over the course of a week, I made repeated good-faith efforts to communicate with the pharmacy, the Center, and Patient Relations to clarify the situation. Despite these efforts, I did not receive clear clinical clarification. Instead, I later received written notice from Emily Stevenson (a University of Phoenix graduate by the way) that my behavior had been characterized as “aggressive,” and my care was terminated. The term “aggressive” is not neutral. As a woman of color, being labeled this way after expressing frustration about inaccurate information is deeply concerning. There is substantial research documenting that women of color are disproportionately described as “aggressive” when advocating for themselves in medical and professional settings. That broader context cannot be separated from this experience. There were no prior documented conduct concerns, no warning, and no attempt at mediation before termination. I was not in an active treatment cycle at the time. During my consultation, Dr. Bulun arrived late and primarily deferred to his fellow. At different points during the visit, the fellow and attending appeared to contradict one another, which created confusion and undermined confidence in the clarity of the care plan being presented. While scheduling delays can happen in busy clinics, the overall interaction felt rushed and not particularly patient-centered. Fertility care is emotionally and financially intensive. Patients deserve accurate insurance guidance, coordinated communication between clinics and pharmacies, and thoughtful handling of conflict when concerns arise. In my experience, those standards were not met. Patients, particularly patients of color, should expect equitable treatment, careful communication, and fair process when advocating for themselves.

J
Juanita Leyva
6 個月前

這是我見過最差的電話客服,他們態度惡劣,根本不幫忙。護士接電話也很拖沓,我正在考慮換醫生。

worse answering service ever they are rude and do not help people at all nurses drag in answering the phones considering on changing doctors

B
B_Face773
已編輯:11 個月前

在FRM(生育與生殖醫學中心),接待你的工作人員態度可能因人而異,你可能會受到粗魯對待,甚至被當作無能或愚笨的人對待。通常情況下,3號櫃檯的女士們都非常和藹可親、樂於助人、尊重他人且彬彬有禮。但在我每次就診時,總能聽到1號櫃檯的工作人員在背後議論剛剛通過電話聯絡過的病人。1號櫃檯的工作人員言辭粗魯,態度惡劣,完全不適合在這樣一個關乎生命誕生的工作場所工作。她似乎很不情願待在那裡,而且至今仍未改正。榮格海姆醫生是一位非常優秀、和藹可親且平易近人的醫生,她讓就診體驗非常愉快。男性患者也會來這家診所,因為他們需要提供精子樣本來幫助創造生命。我看到一些評論說,某天診所裡男性患者太多,讓人覺得“噁心”。但在FRM,男性患者獨自在候診區等候是很正常的。

Depending who takes your appointment at the check in desk at FRM "Fertility Reproductive Medicine" you may get treated rudely and talked to as if your incompetent or unintelligent. Usually the ladies sitting at Desk #3 are extremely…...

M
Mo X
1 年前

這是我第一次也是唯一一次在這裡做試管嬰兒,我只有一個胚胎,結果懷上了雙胞胎。我想感謝這裡的醫生和護士,他們專業又耐心。

It’s my first time did IVF here and it’s my only time, I only have one ambryo,they split to twins. I would like to thank the doctors and nurses here,they’re professional and patience.

K
Katelyn Thompson
1 年前

我在這家診所得到的服務極其緩慢且缺乏人情味。我不會向任何開始計劃生育的人推薦西北醫學中心。我常常感覺自己就像流水線上的一個環節,他們只想儘快把人打發走。 根據我從其他醫院網路就診的人那裡瞭解到的情況,他們的服務效率要高得多,而且我應該能更頻繁地見到我的醫生。

The service I have received from this office is extremely slow & impersonal. I would not recommend Northwestern Medicine to anyone beginning their family planning journey. Often times I feel like I am just a part of a factory where they…...

A
Aden Kadri
1 年前

我強烈推薦大家去西北大學接受生育治療。我之前在另一家診所花了超過一年時間和五萬美元,卻始終無法懷孕,也沒有得到任何個性化的治療方案。後來我轉到西北大學,找到了賈恩醫生,他立刻就找到了問題所在,併為我制定了一套專屬的治療方案。我在那裡做了一次取卵,就獲得了8個PGT-A檢測正常的胚胎!之後我又做了一次胚胎移植,現在已經懷孕八週了。作為新患者,預約可能需要一些時間,但我保證絕對值得等待。

Cannot recommend getting your fertility care at Northwestern more highly. I spent over a year and more than $50k working with another clinic with no explanation for why I wasn't getting pregnant and no personalized care. I was able to…...

以上為最新 10 條評價,共 46 條

相關文章

準備好開始您的生育之旅了嗎?

專業醫療顧問為您提供個性化方案建議

免費諮詢